You can also import the coordinates from Stellarium to the Framing wizard in NINA, then rotate it there to get lined up and apply it to a sequence. These times I have to take a frame and look at the position of the stars in the sub (NINA) to figure out If I really got it right.įor square shaped sensors like the ASI533, it doesn't matter as much, but I'm trying to figure out if there is an option I have set wrong or It's just how it is? Is that like some standard 'sensor alignment' for DSOs or what? This may include many Windows users who have to run ANGLE mode. We keep releasing Qt5-based packages for legacy or obsolete systems. This is the instruction for building Windows 32/64-bit version of Stellarium using Microsoft Visual Studio 2012 and Qt5 (VC 2012) with ANGLE. These packages are tagged with a version number like 1.22.3. This can be seen if you have your telescope pointing to NCP and line up the sensor bracket with the NCP point, assuming that the mount is polar aligned and the axis is pointing to NCP. This is the first release based on the Qt6 framework, so the project is safe for future development. Just like having a DSLR flipped to sideways. OK, this may be a bit embarrassing but until recently I've only used. If I attach any camera that is rectangular shaped sensor, for Stellarium 0 degrees is having the sensor in a vertical position. Since version 0.10.3, Stellariums packages include a number of plug-ins: Angle Measure, Compass Marks, Oculars, Telescope Control, Text User Interface, Satellites, Solar System Editor, Time Zone, Historical Supernovae, Quasars, Pulsars, Exoplanets and Observability analysis. Stellarium confuses me sometimes what it considers 90degrees vs 0.

Stellarium angle version